Skip to content

// Are B2B and B2C Outdated?

This post was inspired by the comments on this post from Obsessed With Conformity.

When it comes to advertising, it seems businesses have always been broken down into two categories: Business-to-Consumer (B2C) and Business-to-Business (B2B). But like most things in advertising today, is this changing? Is it even relevant anymore?

In all my conversations and reading, one of the biggest complaints about a business is that it’s a business. People (whether at the consumer or business level) don’t want to do business with a business. They want to do business with another person.

It’s a person they can connect with, a person they can trust. More importantly, a person can treat them as a person as well.

Whether in an ad, on the phone, using social media and especially in person, people yearn to talk with other people. They don’t want a faceless being from up above.

So where does this leave our acronyms? After all, you know how much advertisers love acronyms. But fear not. I have a new one that can apply to all businesses: P2P (Person to Person).

What do you think? Are the days of B2C and B2B to be replaced by P2P?

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Yep - P2P. Which is basically regular business. I always thought B2B was a funny statement. Thanks for the props JP.
  • No problem. You had a great conversation going on your post, and when you mentioned people to people, it sparked something. Personally, I never understood why there's a difference in marketing to B2C vs. B2B. Maybe that's because there isn't anymore.
blog comments powered by Disqus