<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: // How Curiosity Killed the Competition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pricegroupblog.com/2009/09/how-curiosity-killed-the-competition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pricegroupblog.com/2009/09/how-curiosity-killed-the-competition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:21:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: not_so_madman</title>
		<link>http://pricegroupblog.com/2009/09/how-curiosity-killed-the-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>not_so_madman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pricegroupblog.com/?p=417#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Any blog that starts with a reference to David Ogilvy has got to be accurate. Before the educated copywriters object let me explain, &quot;...has go to be&quot; is the Texas vernacular for &quot;has&quot; or &quot;must.&quot; It just takes us longer to say it. &lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t understand why we don&#039;t all read with a dictionary nearby. I&#039;m amazed at the words &quot;Texas Monthly&quot; columnists use to impress us with their vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any blog that starts with a reference to David Ogilvy has got to be accurate. Before the educated copywriters object let me explain, &#8220;&#8230;has go to be&#8221; is the Texas vernacular for &#8220;has&#8221; or &#8220;must.&#8221; It just takes us longer to say it. <br />I don&#39;t understand why we don&#39;t all read with a dictionary nearby. I&#39;m amazed at the words &#8220;Texas Monthly&#8221; columnists use to impress us with their vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: not_so_madman</title>
		<link>http://pricegroupblog.com/2009/09/how-curiosity-killed-the-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>not_so_madman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pricegroupblog.com/?p=417#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Any blog that starts with a reference to David Ogilvy has got to be accurate. Before the educated copywriters object let me explain, &quot;...has go to be&quot; is the Texas vernacular for &quot;has&quot; or &quot;must.&quot; It just takes us longer to say it. &lt;br&gt;I don&#039;t understand why we don&#039;t all read with a dictionary nearby. I&#039;m amazed at the words &quot;Texas Monthly&quot; columnists use to impress us with their vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any blog that starts with a reference to David Ogilvy has got to be accurate. Before the educated copywriters object let me explain, &#8220;&#8230;has go to be&#8221; is the Texas vernacular for &#8220;has&#8221; or &#8220;must.&#8221; It just takes us longer to say it. <br />I don&#39;t understand why we don&#39;t all read with a dictionary nearby. I&#39;m amazed at the words &#8220;Texas Monthly&#8221; columnists use to impress us with their vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://pricegroupblog.com/2009/09/how-curiosity-killed-the-competition/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 03:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pricegroupblog.com/?p=417#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Why do you think people forward urban legend emails?  If they don&#039;t know that the rumor or legend is false, they look like buffoons.  If they suspect that it is wrong but forward it anyway, they are guilty of being lazy and not checking their facts.  If they think it is true, they are idiots.  It is such a lose-lose scenerio unless they are leading the email with &quot;LOL&quot; or &quot;HAHA!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you think people forward urban legend emails?  If they don&#39;t know that the rumor or legend is false, they look like buffoons.  If they suspect that it is wrong but forward it anyway, they are guilty of being lazy and not checking their facts.  If they think it is true, they are idiots.  It is such a lose-lose scenerio unless they are leading the email with &#8220;LOL&#8221; or &#8220;HAHA!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
